This graphic was part of a recent feature on San Bruno in the LA Times:
Yet page 19 of the NTSB report shows the actual data.
So this begs a couple of questions:
- What did LA Times use as a data source for their graph if it wasn't the NTSB report?
- Why would the underestimate the Impact Radius of San Bruno by nearly 1/2?
(The added black dots were used for alignment purposes between the two maps).